Campaign 2010 is already in full swing for Pennsylvania, and social media is being embraced by savvy candidates and campaign managers. Retweets from candidates and campaign commentators are already filling the tweetstream for @tweetpalawmaker, with @ToomeyForSenate and @DanPA2010 taking the lead for passing along the most campaign trail news.
While there are comparatively few followers out there for our stream, like just about anything else, it isn’t always quantity that makes the difference, but quality. And the followers are shaping up to look like a who’s who of Pennsylvania political media personnel. That is meaningful, since there was never a concerted effort to court any of the journalists currently following the account, and there still hasn’t been a formal press release on the effort to get lawmakers tweeting.
What has been happening so far is testament to the saying “If you build it, they will come.” Now, it is no longer a question of whether or not this will work. The question is, who will benefit? The bottom line is that whether or not politicians make use of social media at all is up to them, but failing to do so is starting to look like a failure to take advantage of an inexpensive resource. What is the ability to pass along important information to multiple members of the press and their audiences with a single click of the mouse worth, particularly during a campaign? Mastercard could easily do a commercial on this one, showing the cost of a computer, internet connection, and granting “priceless” to instant access to the press.
And as always, it’s still a two-way street. No matter how tempting it might be for political opponents to block each other from reading posts on Twitter (or on any other social media site), it would be political suicide. The press would eat the offending candidate for breakfast. So, keeping up with what the other side is doing will be easier.
Social media usage is still split on party lines in Pennsylvania, with a clear majority on the GOP side – that’s including both incumbents and candidates for right now. There is no reason to think that Dems who would be facing opposition in 2010 could expect to face a GOP candidate who doesn’t use social media as a campaign tool. And the followers, if they aren’t traditional press, are the citizen journalists who write blogs on politics, or write letters to the editor regularly. The general public still is swaying toward non-traditional news sources, particularly in politics, gravitating toward blogs written by like-minded people. Blogs are the new way for single issue voters to keep up on the candidates who agree with them. The failure of either party’s politicians to take advantage of that rich resource will make the difference in campaigns of the future, including 2010.
Accessibility – getting the message out, and listening to the needs of the public – is the primary purpose of personal appearances and rallies during any campaign. Social media radically increases the potential for having that dialog with the voters. An attitude that this trend is just a passing fancy, and is beneath the dignity of a politician is beginning to become as foolhardy as the short-lived belief of the previous century that television wouldn’t last.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: campaigns, social media | Leave a Comment »
